Toxic Managers: What to Do With Them
And How to End the Phenomena Permanently
Audience: Employees of toxic managers, equity stakeholders and senior leadership
Author’s note: This article was inspired by the very large, positive responses on LinkedIn to a recent comment, which read:
“Toxic managers are extremely unlikely to believe they are toxic, and even less likely to learn anything from posts. They only learn by getting fired, and they only get fired when equity stakeholders notice the high turnover.
Equity stakeholders: are you watching the store, closely? Are you aware of all the nasties going on when your back is turned? Your employees are, and they leave as soon as they can.
You can survive this in an employer's market, for a while. However, the pendulum that swings isn't televised. There isn't a website out there to warn you it's about to become an employee's market. Then, the game of musical chairs begins, suddenly. The music stops, and everyone rushes to find a chair.
I've seen it happen, several times. Several companies I used to work for no longer exist. They experienced a sudden market correction and BOOM! Out of business.”
Our own experience has led us to conclude that nearly one-third of all managers exhibit habitual, toxic behaviors. Their direct reports hate them, viscerally. They cause high turnover, stress related anxieties, mental and physical health issues, family problems, substance abuse, and organizational chaos.
Yet, their senior management looks the other way. In this in-depth article, we take a clear-eyed look at a brutal class of industry predators, and give clear guidance for employees, equity stakeholders and senior leadership in recognizing, living with, challenging, perhaps terminating, and, ultimately, solving forever the pervasive issue of toxic management.
Contents
Executive Summary
Introduction
Definition of a Toxic Manager
From the Employee’s Point of View
· How Employees Can Identify a Toxic Manager
· Excessive monitoring and policing of employees' work
· Consistently negative feedback and public criticism
· Taking credit for team members' ideas and contributions
· Blaming employees for problems rather than taking responsibility
· Annoying, distressing or unpleasant management behaviors that fall short of toxic
· Surviving Under a Toxic Manager
· When to Quit a Toxically Managed Job
Senior Leadership Responsibility
· How Leaders Can Identify Toxic Managers
· Why Companies Retain Toxic Managers
· The Hidden Accumulation of Technical Debt
· Counselling and Changing Toxic Managers
· When to Terminate a Toxic Manager
Preventing Toxic Management
Conclusion: Transforming Workplace Culture Beyond Toxic Management
References
Executive Summary: Breaking the Cycle of Toxic Management
Toxic management represents one of the most significant yet under addressed threats to organizational success, employee well-being, and sustainable business performance. Beyond the immediate impacts of decreased productivity and increased turnover, toxic management creates cascading failures throughout organizations, manifesting in accumulated technical debt, suppressed innovation, and long-term cultural damage. Conservative estimates suggest toxic management costs U.S. businesses over $200 billion annually in lost productivity, increased healthcare costs, and talent replacement expenses.
The challenge of addressing toxic management lies in its ability to masquerade as high performance, particularly in environments that prioritize short-term metrics over long-term sustainability. Toxic managers often present as results-driven leaders while systematically undermining organizational health through behaviors including psychological manipulation, selective information sharing, and the creation of artificially high-stress environments. This complexity is compounded by organizational dynamics that paradoxically protect toxic managers, including sunk cost fallacy, competency mimicry, and the temporary effectiveness of fear-based motivation.
The technical implications of toxic management extend far beyond interpersonal dynamics. Toxic leaders consistently generate technical debt through rushed implementations, suppressed feedback, and the prioritization of quick wins over sustainable solutions. This creates a compounding liability where each compromised decision builds upon previous shortcuts, resulting in increasingly fragile systems that become exponentially more expensive to maintain or replace. Organizations often fail to recognize this accumulation until critical systems begin to fail, by which point the original toxic managers may have moved on, leaving others to address their technical legacy.
Addressing toxic management requires a multi-faceted approach combining immediate intervention strategies with long-term cultural transformation. Organizations must implement robust detection systems including 360-degree feedback mechanisms, psychological safety metrics, and technical debt assessments. Simultaneously, they need to develop comprehensive leadership development programs that emphasize emotional intelligence, sustainable technical practices, and ethical decision-making. This approach must be supported by clear accountability measures and organizational policies that protect both individual employees and collective institutional health.
The path forward demands a fundamental reimagining of leadership development and organizational culture. Success requires moving beyond traditional management training to create systems that identify, develop, and reward transformative leaders who can drive both technical excellence and human development. Organizations that commit to this transformation not only protect themselves from the devastating impacts of toxic management but position themselves for sustainable success in an increasingly complex business environment. The cost of inaction—in human, technical, and financial terms—far exceeds the investment required to create lasting change.
Introduction
We've all experienced them - the managers who seem to relish making their employees' lives miserable. The ones who berate their team in public, micromanage every little detail, and take credit for their employees' hard work. These toxic managers can singlehandedly destroy morale, productivity, and even an entire company's culture.
Yet, despite the obvious harm they cause, toxic managers often seem to persist and even thrive within many organizations. Why is this the case? And more importantly, what can be done about it?
In this in-depth article, we'll explore the insidious problem of toxic management, providing a comprehensive look at the issue from multiple perspectives. We'll start by defining what exactly constitutes a toxic manager, highlighting the key behaviors and characteristics that set them apart.
From there, we'll equip employees with the knowledge and tools to identify toxic management, even when the individuals in question may be deeply in denial about their own destructive behaviors. Recognizing the signs of a toxic manager is the first critical step toward addressing the problem.
With that foundation in place, we'll delve into strategies that employees can use to survive and even potentially thrive under a toxic manager. This includes techniques for managing up, building supportive peer networks, and setting firm boundaries to protect one's own wellbeing. We'll also examine the difficult decision of when it may be necessary to simply cut ties and seek employment elsewhere.
Turning our attention to leadership, we'll explore how senior executives and equity stakeholders can proactively identify toxic managers within their organizations. High employee turnover, low engagement scores, and even underperforming financial metrics can all serve as red flags that warrant closer inspection. Understanding these warning signs is essential for leaders who want to safeguard their company's culture and long-term success.
Of course, recognizing the problem is only half the battle. We'll also delve into why so many companies struggle to address toxic management, even when the issues are well-known. Factors like short-term performance pressures, misplaced loyalty to high-performing (but abusive) managers, and lack of clear accountability measures all contribute to the persistence of this challenge.
Definition of a Toxic Manager
A toxic manager exhibits behaviors that are extremely detrimental to their employees and the overall work environment. Some key characteristics of a toxic manager include:
Aggressive, abusive, or overly critical behavior: Toxic managers frequently berate, belittle, or publicly humiliate their team members. They may use hostile language, intense anger, or intimidation tactics.
Micromanagement and lack of trust: Toxic managers exhibit an extreme need for control, constantly monitoring their employees' work and second-guessing their decisions. They fail to empower their team or delegate responsibility.
Favoritism and unfair treatment: Toxic managers often play favorites, showering certain employees with praise and advancement opportunities while overlooking or penalizing others. This creates a divisive, inequitable work culture.
Failure to provide clear direction or constructive feedback: Rather than offering guidance and support, toxic managers leave their employees confused and directionless. Feedback is harsh and negative, with little to no tangible suggestions for improvement.
The combination of these toxic management behaviors can have severe consequences, including high employee turnover, low morale, and diminished productivity across the team or organization.
With that context established, we'll provide a roadmap for how senior leaders can effectively counsel and, if necessary, remove toxic managers from their organizations. This includes delivering direct feedback, setting clear improvement plans, and ultimately being willing to make the tough decision to terminate employment when an individual proves unwilling or unable to change their detrimental behaviors.
Finally, we'll explore proactive strategies that organizations can implement to prevent toxic management from taking root in the first place. This covers everything from robust hiring and vetting processes to ongoing leadership development programs and the establishment of clear policies governing managerial conduct.
Ultimately, our goal is to empower both employees and organizational leaders with the knowledge and frameworks needed to identify, address, and ultimately eliminate the scourge of toxic management. While this is undoubtedly a complex and entrenched challenge, we firmly believe that with the right mindset and interventions, it is one that can be overcome.
The costs of allowing toxic managers to persist are simply too high - both for the individuals forced to endure such treatment, and for the companies that may find their very survival threatened by the downstream effects. It's time to shine a light on this issue and take decisive action.
From the Employee’s Point of View
There are two groups within a company that are directly affected by toxic managers: the unfortunate employees who must work under the managers, and senior leadership, to whom toxic managers report. Of the two, it is the employees who feel the most immediate effects, often in the form of dreading going to work. Their most typical response is updating their resume and initiating yet another job hunt.
Senior leadership is often unaware their reports are toxic; two-faced, hypocritical and instinctual behavior among bad managers is extremely common, and busy senior managers are often simply too focused on doing their own jobs to notice. Moreover, it is frequently true that toxic managers look good to their management. That they do so with unethical and predatory practices is often overlooked.
Last, senior leadership are also human beings, subject to the same devils as other people. They can and do practice avoidance and denial, often until the issues they refuse to confront become clear and present dangers to the organization. By then, it is often too late.
How Employees Can Identify a Toxic Manager
Key signs of a toxic manager include:
Excessive monitoring and policing of employees' work
Consistently negative feedback and public criticism
Taking credit for team members' ideas and contributions
Blaming employees for problems rather than taking responsibility
A single, definite lie, where it is impossible to reach any other conclusion
Marked reluctance to issue written instructions or assignments, preferring strictly verbal, and later, unaccountable, instructions to direct reports
The last two points are so bad, such blinding red flags, that employees of a manager that does either should leave as soon as possible. That manager is a communist, and doesn’t belong in management at all.
Employees should watch for managers who micromanage, undermine their team, and fail to provide constructive guidance. Lack of trust, unfair treatment, and high turnover can also indicate a toxic management style.
Excessive monitoring and policing of employees' work
One of the hallmark behaviors of a toxic manager is excessive monitoring and policing of their employees' work. This can manifest in a variety of ways:
Constant check-ins and status updates: Toxic managers will frequently interrupt their team members to demand progress reports, despite the employees already providing regular updates. They cannot seem to trust their staff to work independently and make their own decisions.
Micromanagement of tasks and processes: Instead of delegating responsibilities and empowering their employees, toxic managers will insist on being involved in every little detail. They may dictate exactly how a project or assignment should be carried out, rejecting any deviations from their preferred approach.
Review of completed work: Even after an employee has finished a task, a toxic manager will scrutinize and second-guess their efforts. They may rewrite sections, request endless revisions, or find fault with the end result regardless of its quality.
Unscheduled check-ins and "pop-ins": Toxic managers will frequently interrupt their employees, dropping by workspaces unannounced to monitor activity. This creates an atmosphere of constant surveillance and distrust.
Excessive documentation and paperwork: In an effort to maintain tight control, toxic managers may require excessive reporting, documentation, and bureaucratic processes from their team. Employees find themselves spending more time fulfilling these administrative tasks than actually doing their jobs.
This pervasive monitoring and policing behavior signals a profound lack of confidence in employees' abilities. It conveys the message that the manager believes their staff cannot be trusted to perform their responsibilities without constant oversight and interference. Over time, this can severely undermine morale, engagement, and productivity.
Consistently negative feedback and public criticism
Another key sign of a toxic manager is their tendency to provide consistently negative feedback and criticism, often in a public setting. This behavior can manifest in several ways:
Public reprimands and humiliation: Toxic managers will frequently call out their employees' mistakes or shortcomings in front of the larger team or organization. This public shaming erodes the employee's confidence and respect among their peers.
Disproportionate focus on flaws: Even when providing feedback, toxic managers will hone in almost exclusively on what their employees are doing wrong. They struggle to offer any balanced perspective or recognition of the employee's strengths and accomplishments.
Lack of constructive guidance: When delivering negative feedback, toxic managers fail to provide clear, actionable steps for improvement. Their criticism is often vague and unhelpful, leaving the employee uncertain about how to address the issues raised.
Inconsistent or moving goalposts: Toxic managers may change their performance expectations arbitrarily or fail to communicate them clearly. What was once considered acceptable work can suddenly become unacceptable, with no explanation.
This pattern of relentless, unproductive criticism takes a significant toll on employee morale and engagement. It fosters an environment of fear and anxiety, where team members feel they are constantly walking on eggshells.
Taking credit for team members' ideas and contributions
Another characteristic of toxic managers is their tendency to take credit for their team members' ideas and contributions. This can manifest in several ways:
Appropriating work as their own: Toxic managers may present an employee's original concept, analysis, or solution as if it were their own brainchild. They fail to properly acknowledge the true source.
Downplaying or dismissing employee input: When an employee proposes a suggestion or recommendation, the toxic manager may simply ignore it, only to later present a similar idea as their own. They effectively erase the employee's role.
Hogging the spotlight: Toxic managers love to be the center of attention. They will often dominate meetings and presentations, delivering updates and making key decisions while sidelining their team's involvement.
This behavior is deeply demoralizing for employees. It robs them of the recognition and sense of ownership they rightfully deserve for their efforts. Over time, it can crush their motivation and willingness to contribute innovative ideas.
Blaming employees for problems rather than taking responsibility
Another sign of a toxic manager is their tendency to blame employees for problems rather than taking responsibility themselves. This behavior can manifest in several ways:
Scapegoating: When issues arise, toxic managers will often single out and publicly castigate individual employees as the sole cause, even when the problems stem from systemic failures or the manager's own poor decisions.
Shifting blame: Rather than acknowledge their own mistakes or shortcomings, toxic managers will deflect responsibility by claiming their team members failed to execute properly or provide adequate information.
Lack of accountability: Toxic managers seldom, if ever, hold themselves accountable for negative outcomes. They may claim ignorance, cite external factors, or simply refuse to take ownership of the situation.
This pattern of blame-shifting and evasion of responsibility erodes trust and goodwill within the team. Employees feel they are working in an environment where they can be unfairly targeted and made to shoulder the burden for the manager's own failures. It breeds resentment and a sense that the manager is more concerned with protecting their own ego than addressing genuine problems.
Make no mistake about it: blame is the signature strategy of a loser, whether in business or personal life. A person given to blame is a person to be avoided, and in business, giving a blamer authority over other people is almost guaranteed to be a very bad bet.
Annoying, distressing or unpleasant management behaviors that fall short of toxic
While the behaviors of a truly toxic manager are clear-cut, there are also less extreme management styles that employees may still find frustrating or disheartening, even if they fall short of the toxic designation. These include:
Inconsistent leadership: Some managers struggle to maintain a consistent approach, rapidly flip-flopping between micromanaging and completely hands-off supervision. Employees never know which version of their boss they'll encounter day-to-day, causing confusion and uncertainty.
Lack of communication: Managers who fail to provide clear direction, updates, or feedback leave their teams in the dark. Decisions get made with little explanation, and employees are left to guess at the reasoning or expectations.
Passive-aggressive conduct: Rather than directly addressing issues, some managers resort to subtle jabs, sarcastic remarks, or cold shoulder tactics. This creates a tense, uncomfortable environment that wears on employee morale over time.
Disorganization and poor planning: Managers who struggle with prioritization, scheduling, and workflow management can make their teams' lives unnecessarily difficult. Constant changes, missed deadlines, and last-minute fires become the norm.
Favoritism and personality biases: Some managers allow personal likes, dislikes, or friendships to influence how they treat and evaluate their employees, creating a sense of unfairness and resentment on the team.
While these management styles may not rise to the level of outright toxicity, they can still have a substantial negative impact on employee wellbeing and productivity. Addressing them proactively is important for maintaining a healthy, functional work environment.
Surviving Under a Toxic Manager
When trapped under toxic management, employees often feel powerless and demoralized. However, there are several proven strategies that can help you protect yourself and maintain your professional standing while navigating this challenging situation. These include: managing up through meticulous documentation and professional communication, building supportive networks among your peers, maintaining exemplary work performance, and establishing clear boundaries to avoid personal conflicts.
Managing Up Through Documentation and Professional Communication
Keep detailed records of all interactions with your toxic manager, including dates, times, and specific incidents. Save emails, chat messages, and other written communications. Document verbal conversations by following up with email summaries like "As we discussed in our meeting today..." When your manager makes requests or gives directions, confirm them in writing. This creates a paper trail that can protect you if the manager later denies or misrepresents their instructions. Maintain a professional tone in all communications, even when provoked. Write emails as if they might one day be read by HR or senior leadership - because they might be.
Building Supportive Networks
While avoiding gossip or unprofessional venting, cultivate relationships with trusted colleagues who understand your situation. Build alliances with peers who can verify your version of events if needed. Connect with mentors outside your immediate reporting structure who can provide guidance and perspective. Consider joining professional organizations or industry groups that can expand your network beyond your current workplace. These connections not only provide emotional support but can also lead to future opportunities when you're ready to make a move.
Maintaining Strong Performance
Document your achievements, project milestones, and positive feedback from clients or colleagues. Keep detailed records of your contributions and results. Meet or exceed all deadlines and quality standards. This makes it harder for a toxic manager to criticize your work unfairly and helps protect your professional reputation. Strong performance metrics can also make you more marketable when seeking new opportunities. Save performance reviews, client testimonials, and other evidence of your capabilities.
Setting Professional Boundaries
Establish clear work-life boundaries and stick to them. Don't engage with your manager's attempts to provoke emotional reactions. Maintain a calm, professional demeanor in all interactions. If your manager attempts to draw you into personal conflicts, redirect the conversation back to work-related topics. Document any boundary violations or inappropriate behavior. Consider phrases like "I want to focus on meeting our project deadlines" or "Let's discuss how we can achieve our department's goals" to steer conversations back to professional matters.
While these strategies can help you survive under a toxic manager, remember they are temporary measures. Use this time to quietly plan your exit strategy, update your resume, and explore other opportunities. No employee should have to endure toxic management indefinitely. These techniques can help you maintain your professionalism and protect yourself while you work toward a better situation.
When to Quit a Toxically Managed Job
While there are strategies for surviving under toxic management, there comes a point when leaving becomes the only viable option. Four key indicators signal it's time to move on: when repeated attempts to address issues show no progress, when your mental and physical health are suffering significant damage, when your professional growth has stalled, and when better opportunities become available elsewhere.
Lack of Progress Despite Repeated Attempts
If you've documented issues, communicated professionally, engaged HR or senior leadership when appropriate, and attempted to work constructively with your toxic manager for at least six months with no improvement, it's time to accept that change is unlikely. When your manager continues to deny problems, deflect responsibility, or make empty promises of improvement while maintaining their toxic behavior patterns, you're facing a dead end. If senior leadership has shown they're either unwilling or unable to address the situation, staying longer only wastes your time and energy.
Significant Toll on Mental/Physical Health
Watch for clear warning signs that the toxic work environment is damaging your wellbeing. These might include trouble sleeping, anxiety attacks, depression, weight changes, new or worsening health issues, increased alcohol consumption, or other stress-related symptoms. If you find yourself dreading each workday, feeling physically ill on Sunday nights, or unable to leave work stress at work, these are serious red flags. When your family and friends start commenting on negative changes in your mood or behavior, it's time to prioritize your health over your job.
Limited Opportunities for Growth
Toxic managers often actively suppress their employees' professional development, whether through denying training opportunities, withholding challenging assignments, taking credit for achievements, or providing misleading feedback. If you've gone more than a year without meaningful growth in skills, responsibilities, or advancement opportunities, your career is stagnating. When your toxic manager stands between you and professional development, staying in the role only damages your long-term career prospects.
Better Options Available
The best time to leave is when you have concrete alternatives lined up. This means having either accepted another job offer or having the financial resources to sustain a focused job search. Watch for signals that the job market in your field is strong, such as recruiters reaching out frequently, peer companies actively hiring, or your skills being in high demand. Don't wait for conditions to be perfect - they never will be. But do ensure you have a realistic plan for transitioning to a better situation.
Remember, leaving a toxic manager isn't giving up or admitting defeat - it's making a strategic decision to protect your career and wellbeing. While timing your departure requires careful consideration of personal circumstances, including financial obligations and market conditions, staying too long under toxic management can do lasting damage to both your professional growth and personal health. When multiple warning signs align, particularly if you've already attempted to address the situation without success, it's time to put your exit plan into action.
Senior Leadership Responsibility
At the end of the day, senior leadership is responsible for everything that happens below them. Absent the watchfulness, empathy and clear perception necessary to keep a growing organization healthy and at top performance, the clear likelihood is for the enterprise to glide downward, or, sometimes, suddenly, even dive uncontrollably toward the ground.
Given that employees fear losing their jobs, often experience intimidation, and lack faith that senior leadership has their back, toxic managers often thrive and even ascend up the corporate ladder, their toxicity unbeknownst to their leadership. Only with time, incidents demanding investigation, unaccountable failures, excessive turnover, or other red-flag phenomena, do senior leaders realize they have a serious problem on their hands, one that demands instant attention and forthright action.
How Leaders Can Identify Toxic Managers
As senior leaders, we often pride ourselves on building strong organizations and cultivating excellent management teams. However, toxic managers can slip through our screening processes or develop problematic behaviors over time. The key to protecting our organizations lies in recognizing the objective indicators of toxic management, setting aside personal relationships, and taking decisive action when necessary.
High Employee Turnover and Low Engagement
When talented employees consistently leave a particular manager's team, it's rarely coincidental. Watch for patterns where high-performing individuals, especially those with 2-5 years of tenure, suddenly depart. Exit interviews may not tell the whole story - departing employees often stay diplomatic to preserve references and industry relationships. Instead, look at hard data: teams with turnover rates significantly higher than your company average, especially in roles that traditionally have good retention. Low engagement scores in employee surveys, particularly when specific teams show consistent underperformance in areas like "trust in leadership" or "communication," are red flags that demand investigation. Calculate the real cost of this turnover - recruiting fees, training time, lost productivity, and institutional knowledge walking out the door - and you'll often find it far exceeds the cost of addressing the root cause.
Significant Complaints from Multiple Team Members
While individual complaints might reflect personality conflicts, patterns of similar feedback from multiple team members merit serious attention. Look for consistent themes in performance reviews, skip-level meetings, or anonymous feedback channels. Watch for situations where high-performing employees suddenly show performance issues under a particular manager - this often indicates the problem lies with leadership, not the employees. Pay special attention when employees risk their careers to raise concerns; most people will suffer in silence unless the situation is truly untenable. Remember: for every employee willing to speak up, there are usually several others harboring similar concerns.
Financials and Productivity Metrics Underperforming
Toxic managers often initially appear successful because they drive short-term results through fear and pressure. However, over time, their teams consistently underperform against peers in key metrics: project completion rates, customer satisfaction scores, innovation metrics, or revenue growth. While they may offer plausible excuses and blame external factors, compare their results against other teams facing similar challenges. Hidden costs often lurk beneath surface-level performance: increased sick leave, higher error rates, missed opportunities due to poor team collaboration, and loss of long-term client relationships. These managers might hit their numbers this quarter, but they're destroying long-term value.
Inconsistent Leadership Approach Across the Organization
Toxic managers often display markedly different behaviors when interacting with superiors versus subordinates. They may appear charming and competent in executive meetings while ruling their teams through fear and manipulation. Look for disconnects between how managers present themselves to senior leadership and how they operate day-to-day. Watch for managers who take credit for their team's successes but blame employees for failures. Compare how different managers handle similar challenges - toxic managers often stand out in their unwillingness to accept responsibility or collaborate with peers.
The Cost of Inaction
As senior leaders, we must acknowledge that retaining toxic managers carries enormous risks. Beyond the immediate costs of turnover and reduced productivity, these individuals poison our company culture, damage our employer brand, and create legal liability. Top talent increasingly prioritizes healthy work environments; in today's connected world, reputation travels fast. The question isn't whether we can afford to remove toxic managers - it's whether we can afford not to.
Taking Action
When multiple indicators point to toxic management, we must set aside personal relationships and act decisively. Start with clear documentation of the issues, attempt remediation if appropriate, but be prepared to make difficult decisions. Remember: our primary responsibility is to the organization's long-term success, not to protecting individual managers. Every day we delay addressing toxic management is another day we risk losing valuable employees, damaging our culture, and undermining our company's future.
Why Companies Retain Toxic Managers
Despite the clear damage toxic managers inflict on organizations, many companies continue to employ and even promote these individuals. Understanding why organizations fall into this trap is crucial for breaking the cycle. Let's examine the four key factors that perpetuate toxic management in corporate environments.
Prioritizing Short-Term Results Over Long-Term Culture
The most insidious trap is the seduction of short-term performance metrics. Toxic managers often excel at driving immediate results through fear, pressure, and unsustainable practices. They meet their quarterly numbers, push their teams to "do whatever it takes," and present impressive short-term achievements to senior leadership. However, this approach is akin to burning your furniture to heat your house - it works for a while, but eventually leaves you with nothing. The hidden costs accumulate: increased sick leave, stress-related medical claims, higher error rates due to rushed work, and the steady departure of your most talented employees. By the time these long-term consequences become apparent, significant damage has already occurred to your organization's culture, reputation, and competitive position.
Reluctance to Address Issues with High-Performing Managers
We've all seen it: the sales manager who consistently hits their targets while burning through team members, or the technical leader whose department delivers projects on time but can't retain senior engineers. Senior leadership often hesitates to confront these managers, rationalizing that their results justify their methods. This reluctance stems from several factors: fear of disrupting successful departments, concern about short-term performance impacts, and sometimes simple conflict avoidance. However, this calculation ignores the full cost equation. While a toxic manager might deliver strong numbers today, they're simultaneously destroying the team capabilities and institutional knowledge that drive tomorrow's success. Every high-performing employee who leaves takes with them customer relationships, technical expertise, and cultural values that took years to develop.
Lack of Clear Policies and Accountability Measures
Many organizations lack robust frameworks for identifying and addressing toxic management behaviors. Performance reviews focus on numerical metrics while overlooking leadership quality. Promotion criteria emphasize individual achievement rather than team development and cultural contribution. Without clear policies and consequences for toxic behavior, managers learn they can act with impunity as long as they deliver results. This creates a permissive environment where problematic behaviors gradually escalate. When companies finally decide to address issues, they often find they lack the documentation and established procedures needed to take effective action.
Insufficient Leadership Development and Training
Too often, companies promote high-performing individual contributors into management roles without providing adequate leadership training. These new managers default to what they know - driving for results - without understanding how to develop teams, build culture, or create sustainable success. Without proper guidance and mentorship, even well-intentioned managers can develop toxic behaviors as they struggle to meet performance pressures. The lack of ongoing leadership development means these problematic patterns become entrenched rather than corrected.
The Real Cost of Inaction
Here's what senior leaders must understand: retaining toxic managers isn't the safe, conservative choice - it's a massive gamble with your organization's future. While the costs might not show up clearly on this quarter's balance sheet, they're accumulating in your turnover rates, recruitment costs, employer brand, and team capabilities. In today's connected world, word travels fast about toxic workplaces. Top talent has options and increasingly prioritizes healthy work environments over slight advantages in compensation or title.
The Competitive Advantage of Cultural Health
Companies that systematically identify and remove toxic managers while developing healthy leadership practices gain significant competitive advantages. They become talent magnets, attracting and retaining the best people in their industries. They build stronger, more innovative teams capable of sustaining success over the long term. Most importantly, they create resilient organizations that can weather market challenges without sacrificing their cultural foundations.
The choice is clear: address toxic management proactively, or watch your organization's future slowly erode. The short-term discomfort of confronting these issues pales in comparison to the long-term costs of allowing them to persist.
The Hidden Accumulation of Technical Debt
One of the most insidious and often overlooked costs of toxic management is the rapid accumulation of technical debt. Toxic managers, in their drive for short-term results, frequently force their teams to take shortcuts that create long-term technical problems. They dismiss crucial maintenance work as "not adding value," override architects' concerns about system stability, and push for quick fixes over proper solutions. Their teams, under constant pressure to deliver immediate results, lack the psychological safety to argue for better approaches or the time to implement proper solutions.
This pattern creates a devastating snowball effect. Each rushed project builds upon an increasingly unstable foundation. Technical documentation remains unwritten or becomes outdated because "we don't have time for that right now." Knowledge transfer sessions are skipped. Senior engineers, frustrated by the mounting technical chaos and unable to maintain proper engineering standards, leave the organization. Their replacements, lacking crucial context and under the same toxic pressure, add new layers of problematic code and architecture. Critical systems become "black boxes" that everyone fears to touch.
The true cost of this technical debt may not become apparent for months or years. When it finally surfaces, it often appears as seemingly unrelated problems: increasing production incidents, slower delivery times for new features, rising customer complaints about system stability, or the inability to adapt quickly to market changes. By this point, the toxic manager who caused the problem has often moved on to their next role, leaving others to deal with the consequences. The cost of paying down this technical debt - through system rewrites, emergency fixes, and lost business opportunities - often far exceeds any short-term gains achieved through rushed delivery.
This dynamic is particularly dangerous in today's technology-driven business environment, where software and systems form the backbone of most operations. Organizations must recognize that technical debt created under toxic management isn't just a technical problem - it's a serious business liability that can threaten their very survival. When evaluating a manager's performance, senior leadership must consider not just what they've built, but what they've borrowed against the future to achieve those results.
Counselling and Changing Toxic Managers
While toxic management behaviors often stem from deep-seated psychological patterns, organizations have an obligation to attempt remediation before moving to termination. This process, when properly structured, serves two crucial purposes: it provides an opportunity for genuine change while simultaneously building a clear record of the issues and the organization's good-faith efforts to address them.
Provide Direct Feedback and Coaching Opportunities
The first step is a direct, unambiguous confrontation of the problematic behaviors. This conversation must be specific, documented, and focused on observable actions rather than personality traits. "Your team has lost six senior engineers in the past eight months" is more effective than "You're too harsh with your people." Present clear evidence: turnover rates, engagement scores, productivity metrics, and specific incidents that demonstrate the toxic behavior patterns. Be prepared for denial, defensiveness, or attempts to shift blame to employees. Document both the feedback provided and the manager's response to it. Assign an executive coach who specializes in behavioral change - this provides both support for improvement and another source of objective observation.
Set Clear Expectations and Metrics for Improvement
Develop a formal performance improvement plan with specific, measurable objectives. These should include both behavioral changes and outcome metrics. For example: "Reduce team turnover to company average within six months," "Achieve minimum 75% positive scores on leadership dimensions in next employee survey," "No further incidents of public criticism of team members." Set clear milestones for progress reviews - typically 30, 60, and 90 days. Make it explicit that failure to meet these objectives will result in removal from the management role. Document all expectations in writing and have the manager acknowledge them.
Offer Management Training and Ongoing Support
Provide structured training in crucial management skills: effective communication, emotional intelligence, conflict resolution, and team development. Assign a senior mentor who models healthy leadership behaviors. Create opportunities for the manager to observe and learn from highly effective peers. However, maintain realistic expectations - while skills can be taught, fundamental attitudes toward power and authority are much harder to change. Watch carefully for surface-level compliance masking unchanged underlying behaviors. Document both the support provided and the manager's level of engagement with improvement opportunities.
Monitor Progress and Be Willing to Make Tough Decisions
Establish a robust monitoring system that includes regular check-ins with the manager's team members, skip-level meetings, and objective performance metrics. Pay attention to subtle indicators: Are team members more willing to speak up in meetings? Has voluntary overtime decreased? Are projects running more smoothly? Watch for patterns of temporary improvement followed by reversion to toxic behaviors - this is common when managers realize they're under scrutiny. Document all observations, both positive and negative.
The Reality Check
While offering support for change is important, organizations must maintain clear-eyed realism about the probability of success. Truly toxic managers often lack the self-awareness and emotional capacity for meaningful change. They may go through the motions of compliance while seeking ways to hide or justify their harmful behaviors. This remediation period, therefore, serves an equally important secondary purpose: building an ironclad case for termination if necessary.
Documentation is Critical
Throughout this process, maintain meticulous documentation of:
Initial feedback and performance improvement plans
All support and resources provided
Regular progress assessments
Specific incidents of both improvement and continued problems
Impact on team performance and morale
The manager's level of engagement with improvement efforts
This documentation serves multiple purposes: protecting the organization legally, demonstrating fair treatment to other employees, and supporting the termination decision if improvement doesn't occur. It also helps counter the common tendency of senior leadership to waver when faced with difficult personnel decisions about fellow managers.
Remember: while we hope for positive change, our primary responsibility is to protect our organization and its employees. If a toxic manager shows insufficient improvement despite receiving appropriate support and opportunities to change, swift and decisive action becomes necessary. The remediation period should be long enough to allow for genuine change but not so long that it continues to damage team morale and organizational health.
When to Terminate a Toxic Manager
By this point in the process, you've invested significant resources attempting to rehabilitate your toxic manager. You've provided feedback, training, coaching, and multiple opportunities for change. However, the fundamental patterns persist, though perhaps in more subtle forms. Now comes the moment that tests your leadership resolve: executing a necessary termination despite the manager's potential technical competence or short-term results.
Repeated Failures to Change Behavior Despite Interventions
When a toxic manager has received clear feedback, specific improvement plans, and adequate support yet continues their destructive behaviors, you face a simple truth: they either cannot or will not change. Watch for these telling patterns:
Surface compliance followed by regression to toxic behaviors
Shifting their problematic conduct to less visible formats (private meetings instead of public criticism)
Maintaining their behavior but becoming more skilled at hiding it from senior leadership
Retaliating against team members who provided feedback
Making excuses or blaming others for their failure to improve
The pattern is clear: they're playing a waiting game, hoping you'll eventually lose interest in the problem. Each day you delay addressing this situation compounds the damage to your organization.
Significant Damage to Team Morale and Productivity
By this stage, the impact on your team is severe and potentially irreversible:
High-performing employees are actively job hunting
Remaining team members are disengaged and merely going through the motions
Innovation and creativity have been stifled by fear
Productivity metrics show declining trends despite increased pressure
Sick leave and stress-related absences are increasing
Competitors are actively recruiting your best people, knowing they're vulnerable
The longer you wait to act, the more talent you'll lose - not just from the toxic manager's immediate team, but from throughout your organization as word spreads about your unwillingness to address the problem.
Irrecoverable Breakdown of Trust with Employees
Trust, once broken, is extremely difficult to rebuild. When employees see that:
Their feedback about toxic behavior was acknowledged but not acted upon
Improvement plans were not enforced
The toxic manager suffered no real consequences for their actions
Senior leadership prioritized the toxic manager over team wellbeing
They draw a devastating conclusion: the organization's stated values are merely window dressing. This loss of trust extends far beyond the immediate team, affecting your entire organization's culture and employer brand.
Ethical Violations or Legal Liability Concerns
By this point, you're likely facing increased risk:
Documentation of hostile work environment claims
Potential discrimination or harassment issues
Whistleblower complaints about unethical practices
Employee health issues related to workplace stress
Risk of wrongful termination suits from employees who left
Potential class action situations developing
Every day you delay termination increases your organization's legal exposure and ethical culpability.
The Cost of Hesitation
Perhaps you're concerned about:
Short-term disruption to operations
The cost of finding a replacement
Political fallout within the management team
The toxic manager's technical knowledge or client relationships
However, these pale in comparison to the costs of inaction:
Continued loss of top talent
Declining productivity and innovation
Damage to company culture and reputation
Increased legal and regulatory risks
Lost business opportunities due to dysfunctional teams
Making the Decision
Remember: terminating a toxic manager isn't just about ending their employment - it's about:
Demonstrating your commitment to organizational values
Showing employees that their concerns matter
Protecting your company's future capabilities
Reducing legal and reputational risk
Rebuilding trust with your workforce
The Path Forward
Execute the termination professionally but decisively:
Have all documentation in order
Coordinate with HR and legal counsel
Prepare a transition plan for the team
Communicate clearly with affected stakeholders
Act swiftly once the decision is made
Your organization is watching. How you handle this situation will define your culture and values more powerfully than any mission statement or corporate policy. The temporary discomfort of executing a necessary termination is far preferable to the long-term damage of continued toxic leadership. Act now, before you lose the very people who make your organization successful.
Preventing Toxic Management
The most cost-effective way to handle toxic management is to prevent it entirely. While this requires significant upfront investment in processes and culture, it's far less expensive than dealing with the aftermath of toxic leadership. Let's examine how organizations can systematically prevent toxic management from taking root.
Robust Hiring and Vetting Processes for Manager Roles
The first line of defense is your hiring process. Traditional interviews often fail to reveal toxic tendencies, as these individuals are frequently skilled at presenting well in limited interactions. Instead:
Design behavioral interviews that specifically probe for past leadership challenges and solutions
Require candidates to present their leadership philosophy and specific examples of team development
Include peer-level interviews to assess how candidates interact with potential colleagues
Conduct thorough reference checks, including speaking with former team members when possible
Use simulation exercises that reveal how candidates handle stress and conflict
Watch for red flags: taking credit for team achievements, speaking dismissively of previous employees, or showing resistance to feedback
Most importantly, resist the temptation to promote top individual contributors to management roles without proper vetting. Technical excellence doesn't predict leadership capability.
Regular 360-Degree Feedback and Performance Reviews
Create a culture of continuous feedback:
Implement regular, anonymous 360-degree reviews for all managers
Include specific questions about leadership style and team climate
Monitor trends in feedback over time, not just snapshot metrics
Create safe channels for employees to raise concerns early
Track leading indicators like team turnover, sick leave patterns, and engagement scores
Conduct regular skip-level meetings between senior leadership and lower-level employees
The key is acting on this feedback early, before problems become entrenched. Many toxic managers develop their worst behaviors gradually, after they've established themselves in the organization.
Leadership Development Programs and Coaching
Invest in developing healthy leadership practices:
Provide comprehensive leadership training before promoting individuals to management
Create mentorship programs pairing new managers with experienced leaders who model healthy behaviors
Offer ongoing coaching and development opportunities
Include emotional intelligence and team development in management training
Teach specific skills for handling conflict, providing feedback, and building psychological safety
Create peer support networks where managers can discuss challenges and share solutions
Remember that leadership development isn't a one-time event but a continuous process requiring regular reinforcement and practice.
Clear Policies and Accountability for Management Conduct
Establish explicit standards for management behavior:
Define clear expectations for leadership conduct in writing
Include specific examples of both acceptable and unacceptable behaviors
Create metrics for measuring management effectiveness beyond just financial results
Build leadership quality measures into promotion and compensation decisions
Establish clear consequences for toxic behaviors
Regular audit of management practices and their impacts
Cultural Integration and Senior Leadership Role
Prevention starts at the top. Senior leaders must:
Model healthy leadership behaviors consistently
Make management quality a regular topic in executive discussions
Allocate sufficient resources to leadership development
Be willing to pass on technically strong candidates who show toxic tendencies
Create incentives that reward long-term team development over short-term results
Address small issues before they become significant problems
The Role of Human Resources
Empower your HR team to:
Develop comprehensive management assessment tools
Create and maintain leadership development programs
Monitor patterns in employee feedback and turnover
Intervene early when concerning patterns emerge
Provide objective counsel to senior leadership about management issues
Prevention as Strategic Investment
View toxic management prevention as a strategic investment in your organization's future:
Calculate and track the full cost of toxic management, including turnover, lost productivity, and legal risk
Budget appropriately for leadership development and support systems
Measure and report on management quality metrics alongside financial results
Create succession planning that emphasizes leadership quality
Build your employer brand around healthy management practices
Long-term Success
Organizations that excel at preventing toxic management gain significant competitive advantages:
Lower turnover and recruiting costs
Higher employee engagement and productivity
Stronger innovation and creativity
Better ability to attract top talent
More resilient teams and culture
Reduced legal and reputational risks
Remember: The goal isn't perfection, but rather creating systems that identify and address potential issues early, before they can develop into toxic patterns. This requires ongoing vigilance and commitment from all levels of leadership, but the return on investment in terms of organizational health and sustainable performance makes it well worth the effort.
Conclusion: Transforming Workplace Culture Beyond Toxic Management
The pervasive problem of toxic management is not an insurmountable challenge, but a critical opportunity for organizational transformation. What begins as a seemingly intractable issue of individual leadership failures is, in fact, a systemic problem that requires a holistic, multi-dimensional approach to address.
The Human Cost of Inaction
Throughout this exploration, we've illuminated the profound impact of toxic management—a phenomenon that goes far beyond mere workplace discomfort. Toxic managers don't just diminish productivity; they erode human potential, mental health, and organizational trust. The psychological toll on employees is real and measurable, manifesting in increased stress, decreased job satisfaction, higher turnover rates, and long-lasting emotional scars.
Technical Debt: The Hidden Organizational Liability
One of the most insidious consequences of toxic management is the accumulation of technical debt. Toxic managers create environments that prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability, leading to:
Rushed, poorly conceived technical solutions
Suppression of critical feedback and improvement suggestions
Discouraging comprehensive documentation and knowledge sharing
Rewarding quick fixes over robust, scalable implementations
Creating a culture of fear that prevents proactive problem-solving
This technical debt becomes a compounding organizational liability, where each compromised decision builds upon previous shortcuts, creating increasingly complex and fragile systems that become exponentially more difficult and expensive to maintain or replace.
A Shared Responsibility
Addressing toxic management is not the responsibility of a single stakeholder. It requires a collaborative effort:
Employees must develop the self-awareness, resilience, and courage to recognize, resist, and respond to toxic behaviors.
Managers must commit to continuous self-improvement, emotional intelligence, and ethical leadership.
Organizations must create robust systems of accountability, transparent communication, and proactive leadership development.
Beyond Elimination: Cultivating Positive Leadership
The goal is not merely to identify and remove toxic managers, but to fundamentally reimagine leadership. This means:
1. Redefining leadership success beyond traditional metrics of productivity and profit
2. Embedding emotional intelligence and empathy into leadership training
3. Creating organizational cultures that prioritize psychological safety
4. Developing comprehensive feedback mechanisms that allow for genuine, constructive dialogue
The Ripple Effect of Positive Change
When organizations commit to eliminating toxic management, the benefits extend far beyond individual workplaces. Healthier work environments contribute to:
Enhanced innovation and creativity
Improved mental health and well-being
More engaged and loyal workforces
Stronger, more resilient organizational cultures
A Call to Action
Transforming toxic management is not a destination but a continuous journey of growth, learning, and commitment. It requires:
Ongoing education
Willingness to have difficult conversations
Courage to challenge established norms
Empathy for both those experiencing toxic leadership and those who may not realize their own destructive patterns
Final Thoughts
The most powerful antidote to toxic management is not punishment, but understanding. By approaching this challenge with compassion, strategic thinking, and a genuine commitment to human dignity, we can create workplaces that don't just survive, but truly thrive.
The path forward is clear: leadership is a privilege, not a right. It is a responsibility to nurture, support, and elevate those we are entrusted to lead.
References
Why Every Leader Needs to Worry About Toxic Culture
What’s the Cost of a Toxic Boss?
Toxic Workplace Cultures Cost Companies Billions
SHRM Reports Toxic Workplace Cultures Cost Billions
The Cost of a Toxic Culture and How to Fix It
The Cost of a Toxic Workplace Culture
The Organizational Costs of Toxic Leadership: Beyond Employee Health
New Data Highlights Financial Toll of Toxic Workplaces
Toxic Workplaces Are Bad For Workers. They Are Also Bad for Business
More information about Overlogix can be found at Welcome to Overlogix! Our Substack, now our main content repository, is online and available for browsing. An index of Substack articles can be found at this link.
Our online portfolio can be found at our LinkedIn master index. Our articles on applied AI are indexed at our Applied AI index, business topics at our B2B Business Index, and our TL;DR series of rapid introductions to AI and related topics lives at our AI Mini-Wiki. Critical information on getting a job are detailed at our Getting a Job index. AI news, including our list of curated links to articles of interest, can be found at our AI News page.
Thanks for reading! More to come!